mohamade mazhari; sommayeh marandi
Volume 7, Issue 1 , December 2018, , Pages 99-111
Abstract
AbstractThe competence and the capacity are two important keys in classical branches of law hence public law and private law that have many functions. The distinction between the competence in public law and the capacity in private law is related primarily to classic distinguish between public law and ...
Read More
AbstractThe competence and the capacity are two important keys in classical branches of law hence public law and private law that have many functions. The distinction between the competence in public law and the capacity in private law is related primarily to classic distinguish between public law and private law. To understanding the nature of the competence is involved factors such as the rule of law, the limitation of power, the classification of legal norms and the administrative and the regulatory- organizational hierarchy, Therefore, by this distinction, is stems results including the being right of the capacity and the obligatory of the competence. Therefore, the purpose of the lack of capacity is the individual interests and the purpose of the lack of competence, is the public interest. This distinction between the capacity and the competence is bring to specific legal effects. In other words, is caused distinction in monitoring between the capacity and the competence. The other legal effects resulting from the recent distinction, the difference in the reference procedure between the capacity and the competence, because the scope of the competence claims may be constitutional or administrative proceedings so they have a different reference compared with the capacity claims that proceed in General Courts, are processed to the Court of Administrative Justice.
